rtcweb-wg / jsep

33 stars 32 forks source link

37) [rfced] Section 5.3.1: We found this RFC Editor Note on #907

Closed juberti closed 4 years ago

juberti commented 4 years ago

37) [rfced] Section 5.3.1: We found this RFC Editor Note on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep/writeup/:

OLD:

The first step in generating an initial answer is to generate session-level attributes. The process here is identical to that indicated in the initial offers section above, except that the "a=ice-options" line, with the "trickle" option as specified in [I-D.ietf-ice-trickle], Section 4, is only included if such an option was present in the offer.

NEW:

The first step in generating an initial answer is to generate session-level attributes. The process here is identical to that indicated in the initial offers section above, except that the "a=ice-options" line, with the "trickle" option as specified in [I-D.ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip], Section 4.1.3, is only included if such an option was present in the offer.

Please note that the "OLD" text does not match what we found in the provided draft:

The first step in generating an initial answer is to generate session-level attributes. The process here is identical to that indicated in the initial offers section above, except that the "a=ice-options" line, with the "trickle" option as specified in [I-D.ietf-ice-trickle], Section 3, and the "ice2" option as specified in [RFC8445], Section 10, is only included if such an option was present in the offer.

We updated as follows. As noted previously, (1) for ease of the reader and (2) to create a usable hyperlink in the .html file, we changed "the initial offers section above" to "Section 5.2.1 above."

Currently:

The first step in generating an initial answer is to generate session-level attributes. The process here is identical to that indicated in Section 5.2.1 above, except that the "a=ice-options" line, with the "trickle" option as specified in [RFC8840], Section 4.1.3 and the "ice2" option as specified in [RFC8445], Section 10, is only included if such an option was present in the offer.

juberti commented 4 years ago

I think the current draft text (the 3rd block of text above) is correct, but based on the note the proposed text (4th block) may be preferred. @adamroach as he wrote the note and can help disambiguate.

juberti commented 4 years ago

The proposed (4th) block of text is correct.

juberti commented 4 years ago

Closed by #951