Open rtoy opened 4 months ago
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-04 01:43:16 Created by robert_dodier on 2022-04-02 19:42:30 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3961/#2af3
Thanks for the report, a couple of notes. (1) Looks like the bug still happens with a = 1. I'll look for a simpler example too.
(2) Looks like integrate
is calling RISCHINT to get an antiderivative, and then evaluating that. Looks like the antiderivative is invalid -- plotting the result from integrate(..., t)
(i.e., indefinite integral) shows that it seems to switch from one branch of sqrt
to the other at t = %pi. So that seems to be a bug in RISCHINT -- it's not noticing the issue with sqrt
.
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-04 01:43:20 Created by robert_dodier on 2022-04-03 04:29:35 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3961/#496d
A simpler example which shows the bug is just
risch (sqrt (sin(t)^2 + (1 - cos(t))^2), t);
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-04 01:43:23 Created by robert_dodier on 2022-04-03 04:52:21 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3961/#dc64
For both the original example and the smaller one I found, I see that the result contains atan2(sin(t), cos(t))
. I think the problem stems from that, not from RISCHINT.
Substituting atan2(sin(t), cos(t)) = t
and then evaluating the result at 2*%pi
and 0 yields 256/15 (with a = 1), which agrees with Mma.
Plotting atan2(sin(t), cos(t))
over 0 to 2*%pi
shows a jump at t = %pi
when it changes from %pi
to - %pi
.
Maxima assumes atan2
returns a result in the range [- %pi, %pi]
instead of [0, 2*%pi]
. I'm not sure what would need to change, but from what I remember, that assumption is pretty deeply ingrained.
A related issue is that RISCHINT converts trig functions to complex exponentials and then works on that. I guess we would want to verify that the complex exponential result is correct, so that it's only the final step, involving a complex exponential which ended up as atan2(sin(t), cos(t))
, is problematic.
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-04 01:43:27 Created by robert_dodier on 2022-04-03 22:03:20 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3961/#7391
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-04 01:43:14 Created by sergniko on 2022-03-28 19:25:25 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3961
Maxima get this results
but Wolfram Alpha's answer is (256 a^3)/15 if you change upper limit to %pi
or change
the answer is correct.
wxMaxima version: 21.05.2_MSW using wxWidgets version: wxWidgets 3.1.4 Maxima version: 5.45.1 Maxima build date: 2021-07-04 21:51:12 Host type: x86_64-w64-mingw32 System type: Win32 6.2.9200 X86-64 Lisp implementation type: SBCL Lisp implementation version: 2.0.0 wxMaxima's idea of the directory layout is: User configuration dir: C:\Users\serg/maxima/ Help dir: C:\maxima-5.45.1\share/doc/wxmaxima