The ./configure script for Maxima announces the usual GNUisms:
Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
...
--with-ccl=<prog> Use OpenMCL executable <prog> (default ccl)
--with-ccl64=<prog> Use ccl64 executable <prog> (default dx86cl64)
Passing --without-foo doesn't work in some cases though. I noticed this with ccl64, where the resulting value of --with-ccl64=no is interpreted literally as the name of the compiler:
$ ./configure --without-ccl64
...
Summary:
Compiling an maxima image that uses "no"
Use --enable-ccl64-exec to build a standalone executable instead.
default lisp: ccl64
wish executable name: "wish"
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-09 10:42:02 Created by mjorlitzky on 2021-03-27 13:37:46 Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3757
The
./configure
script for Maxima announces the usual GNUisms:Passing
--without-foo
doesn't work in some cases though. I noticed this with ccl64, where the resulting value of--with-ccl64=no
is interpreted literally as the name of the compiler: