Open linshengnan2020 opened 3 years ago
Try other assemblers first, if all give small N50, let us discuss it again.
I have used several assemblers ,such as mecat2, flye, WTDBG2, smartdenovo and nextdenovo , the results of smartdenovo and nextdenovo were relatively good, the N50 is 82k and 157k.
Have a look at smartdenovo.pl, have you chosen the zmo
engine? The default is dmo
, much faster, but gives reletively worse alignments.
hi, I have run a 1G , diploid genome with 70~80% repetitive sequences genome . The coverage of my PacBio data is approximately 40 x. As a result the final assembly N50 is 82k . I would be interested how to adjust the parameters to improve the assembly result. Could you please give me some advises? Thank you very much!