Seeing the score calc equation, the distance term could overwhelm the remained two term.
I guess that kind of situation is not intended when designing this project, so I want to ask that this equation is proper.
If It is what you already considered, I'm gonna keep going to get the highest score comfortably!
Thanks.
c.f) In the result of my design now, distance score is 10+ times larger than sum of the remained two.
and for exploiting this, it seems that we don't have to care about scheduling things in an ECU much.
The score function is intended.
We thought that reducing the distance in the given configuration is much more difficult than reducing # of ECUs or the lap time.
Seeing the score calc equation, the distance term could overwhelm the remained two term.
I guess that kind of situation is not intended when designing this project, so I want to ask that this equation is proper.
If It is what you already considered, I'm gonna keep going to get the highest score comfortably!
Thanks.
c.f) In the result of my design now, distance score is 10+ times larger than sum of the remained two. and for exploiting this, it seems that we don't have to care about scheduling things in an ECU much.