Reported at AGU 2019 by Christian Seiler, the MODIS lai we have encoded is a single year replicated to extend from 2000 thru 2005. I am given to understand that our original intent was to have this be more of a representative year.
If this is still the desired intent, the dataset should be formatted as a climatology. ILAMB can understand annual cycles and compute an annual cycle across a span of years indicated in the file.
However, is there a good reason we shouldn't just compare MODIS lai at the years encoded in the data?
Reported at AGU 2019 by Christian Seiler, the MODIS lai we have encoded is a single year replicated to extend from 2000 thru 2005. I am given to understand that our original intent was to have this be more of a representative year.
If this is still the desired intent, the dataset should be formatted as a climatology. ILAMB can understand annual cycles and compute an annual cycle across a span of years indicated in the file.
However, is there a good reason we shouldn't just compare MODIS lai at the years encoded in the data?