Open connorshea opened 5 years ago
I'm not sure if there's a valid reason to use
id: false
besides creating a join table?
Not if the Rails developers control the database schema. But, sometimes we write migrations to mirror a an existing DB schema just for local development. In that case, I'd still be ok with an offense here. We're well aware of our deviation from standard practice when we're working in this scenario.
Since this is a matter of coding style, I think it can be implemented if the style guide accepts it. I'll transfer it as a style guide issue to the repo.
create_join_table
doesn't need t.integer
for FKs, the original Rails Guide has t.index
.
I'm not sure if there's a valid reason to use id: false besides creating a join table?
Natural PK?
In a migration you can create a join table in two ways, with
create_table
andid: false
, orcreate_join_table
.Source: https://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#creating-join-tables-for-has-and-belongs-to-many-associations
I'd like a cop that prefers the
create_join_table
syntax overid: false
.The only problem would be, I'm not sure if there's a valid reason to use
id: false
besides creating a join table?