For performance and Java integration reasons, JRuby provides a native implementation of the set library. We would like to be able to use the gem, and our users will eventually add the gem to their bundles, so we need an answer. This will probably mean importing our extension into the gem, or we push a separate gem with our extension and load it from the pure-Ruby gem.
It depends on how large part is written in Java, but I think it should be better maintained separately and there could be some tricks in loading on the pure-Ruby gem part and such a change request is welcome.
For performance and Java integration reasons, JRuby provides a native implementation of the
set
library. We would like to be able to use the gem, and our users will eventually add the gem to their bundles, so we need an answer. This will probably mean importing our extension into the gem, or we push a separate gem with our extension and load it from the pure-Ruby gem.I will handle making the changes necessary.