Closed naitoh closed 2 weeks ago
In rb_strseq_index(), the result of rb_enc_check() is used.
rb_strseq_index()
rb_enc_check()
enc = rb_enc_check(str, sub);
return strseq_core(str_ptr, str_ptr_end, str_len, sub_ptr, sub_len, offset, enc);
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/6c7209cd3788ceec01e504d99057f9d3b396be84/string.c#L4309-L4318
strseq_core(const char *str_ptr, const char *str_ptr_end, long str_len, const char *sub_ptr, long sub_len, long offset, rb_encoding *enc) { const char *search_start = str_ptr; long pos, search_len = str_len - offset; for (;;) { const char *t; pos = rb_memsearch(sub_ptr, sub_len, search_start, search_len, enc);
It shows String as a pattern is 1.24x faster than Regexp as a pattern.
$ benchmark-driver benchmark/check_until.yaml Warming up -------------------------------------- regexp 9.225M i/s - 9.328M times in 1.011068s (108.40ns/i) regexp_var 9.327M i/s - 9.413M times in 1.009214s (107.21ns/i) string 9.200M i/s - 9.355M times in 1.016840s (108.70ns/i) string_var 11.249M i/s - 11.255M times in 1.000578s (88.90ns/i) Calculating ------------------------------------- regexp 9.565M i/s - 27.676M times in 2.893476s (104.55ns/i) regexp_var 10.111M i/s - 27.982M times in 2.767496s (98.90ns/i) string 10.060M i/s - 27.600M times in 2.743465s (99.40ns/i) string_var 12.519M i/s - 33.746M times in 2.695615s (79.88ns/i) Comparison: string_var: 12518707.2 i/s regexp_var: 10111089.6 i/s - 1.24x slower string: 10060144.4 i/s - 1.24x slower regexp: 9565124.4 i/s - 1.31x slower
Thanks.
Why?
In
rb_strseq_index()
, the result ofrb_enc_check()
is used.https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/6c7209cd3788ceec01e504d99057f9d3b396be84/string.c#L4309-L4318
Benchmark
It shows String as a pattern is 1.24x faster than Regexp as a pattern.