What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?
The rationale and technical details for the bundle fund command are explained in the RFC, but roughly:
A new metadata key, funding_uri, can be specified, that points to a funding page for a gem
On a successful bundle install or bundle update, a message will be printed out that indicates gems which require support: 4 gems you depend on are looking for funding
bundle fund will list out all those gems, with their funding links
bundle info will include the funding_uri in its printout
You can restrict bundle fund to only list information for a specific group
Dependencies of dependencies are currently not listed in bundle fund; this is by design
What was the end-user or developer problem that led to this PR?
This PR implements the
bundle fundproposal in this accepted RFC.What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?
The rationale and technical details for the
bundle fundcommand are explained in the RFC, but roughly:metadatakey,funding_uri, can be specified, that points to a funding page for a gembundle installorbundle update, a message will be printed out that indicates gems which require support:4 gems you depend on are looking for fundingbundle fundwill list out all those gems, with their funding linksbundle infowill include thefunding_uriin its printoutbundle fundto only list information for a specific groupbundle fund; this is by design