Closed gjtorikian closed 4 years ago
Is there a specific reason why funding_uri
is not a part of the metadata?
Is there a specific reason why
funding_uri
is not a part of the metadata?
I never knew about this attribute before. It certainly makes sense to add there as well.
You can read more details about this "sandboxed, freeform" hash of URIs, in the Specification source code: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/blob/master/lib/rubygems/specification.rb#L365
Ok, I've made a quick change to the RFC to note that this key should go in the metadata
attribute.
(Glad you liked it. Perhaps it reduces friction!)
I do believe so, especially since it matches https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/3060
Is there anything I can do here to move this along?
I’m in favor of this, but I’d like to give the rest of the team a chance to weigh in. Let’s give it 3 more days and then accept if no new comments arrive. 👍🏻
This has been open to comment for enough time i think and we're in favor of the RFC. Accepted.
This is an RFC for the suggestion proposed in https://github.com/rubygems/rfcs/issues/22: adding a
bundle fund
command which shows information about any gems requiring funding. I look forward to hearing any feedback!