Open shrouti1507 opened 1 week ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 85.18519%
with 8 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 88.93%. Comparing base (
4c0c681
) to head (1565e3a
). Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/v0/destinations/salesforce/utils.js | 82.22% | 8 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Test report for this run is available at: https://test-integrations-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/integrations-test-reports/rudder-transformer/3773/test-report.html
Issues
13 New issues
1 Accepted issue
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
92.9% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
salesforceResponseHandler to re-visit using switch case instead of multiple if-else statements
To have single logic of to infer from event for OAUTH or LEGACY implementation - https://github.com/rudderlabs/rudder-transformer/pull/2873#discussion_r1415313844
What is the related Linear task?
Resolves INT-1129
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
N/A
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
N/A
Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.
N/A
Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?
N/A
@coderabbitai review
Developer checklist
[ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
[ ] No breaking changes are being introduced.
[ ] All related docs linked with the PR?
[ ] All changes manually tested?
[ ] Any documentation changes needed with this change?
[ ] Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?
[ ] Is the PR limited to one linear task?
[ ] Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?
Reviewer checklist
[ ] Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
[ ] Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.