ruflin
commented
8 years ago I think having it under FOS is a good option if possible as it is also close to where it is used initially. If other frameworks pick it up for use we can think about a different solution at a later stage.
I don't know who the owners of FOS are and what the requirements are to get a repo inside, but it would be nice if we have strong contributors, that we could also give them write access to the repo.
In previous discussions in #1017 it is clear that the preferred method is to keep each implementation in its own repository.
Who should own these repositories? Should there be a few default transformers implemented like doctrine (ORM and ODM) and Propel?
I don't have a preference. FOSElasticaBundle will need to implement Doctrine ORM, MongoDB ODM, CouchDB ODM and a few others which can hopefully be handled under a single implementation. We can put them in the FriendsOfSymfony namespace if necessary.