kvart2006
commented
7 years ago Hi, Done. I hope, I corrected (in the right way) the NEW LINE issues. Bela
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, huikang notifications@github.com wrote:
@huikang requested changes on this pull request.
should zeromq/benchmark/benchmark.nb be removed from the PR? Thanks.
In zeromq/README.md https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917 :
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +# Overview + +This is zeromq 4.2.2 for rumprun. The test platform is running Ubuntu 16.04 and the compilation options include
-std=c++17. + +## Maintainer + + Bela Berde, bela.berde@gmail.com + Github: @kvart2006 + +## Instructions +Use the includedMakefileby typingmake. Note thatlibtoolis required to runautogen.sh, andautomakeandautoconfforconfigure.what is the expected outcome of the make? For example, could you point out what are the executables or binaries out of the make command.
In zeromq/README.md https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917 :
+
+$ x86_64-rumprun-netbsd-gcc <filename> -I <path-to-zeromq-package>/include \ +-L <path-to-zeromq-package>/lib -lpthread -lzmq -o <filename-output> ++Example (testing): ++<path-to-zeromq-package>/lib = /root/git/rumprun-packages/pkgs/lib +<path-to-zeromq-package>/include = /root/git/rumprun-packages/pkgs/include + +x86_64-rumprun-netbsd-g++ -std=c++17 example1.cpp -I/root/git/rumprun-packages/pkgs/include -L/root/git/rumprun-packages/pkgs/lib -lpthread -lzmq -o example1-rr + +rumprun-bake hw_generic example1-rr.bin example1-rr + +rumprun qemu -i example1-rr.bin ++All other steps (baking, running) remain the same.What do you mean by "all other steps"? Does it refer to the other example?
In zeromq/README.md https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917 :
+ +rumprun-bake hw_generic example1-rr.bin example1-rr + +rumprun qemu -i example1-rr.bin +
+All other steps (baking, running) remain the same. + +### Example 1 +A simple one-way zeromq messaging using ZMQ_REQ and ZMQ_REP. + +### Example 2 +A simple one-way zeromq messaging using ZMQ_DEALER (asynchronos). + + +## Benchmark +The rumprun xen benchmark is against docker and rumprun qemu. All the tests are performed in Virtualbox by simply running theexemple1``` 10 times. Note that the goal here is to have a first performance trend, and not to globally evaluate rumprun performance.it is not clear to me how others can reproduce the results with your examples. Could you provide some stey-by-stey command to run the test?
In zeromq/examples/example2/example2.cpp https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917 :
- assert (cont_rep != NULL);
- sin = rcv_string (cont_rep, ZMQ_DEALER, "tcp://*:5580");
- std::cout <<" Message rcv: " << sin << std::endl;
- std::cout << "=======================" << std::endl;
- ind = zmq_ctx_destroy (cont_rep);
- assert (ind == 0);
- end = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
- std::chrono::duration
elapsed_seconds = end-start; - std::time_t end_time = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(end);
- std::cout << "Elapsed time = " << elapsed_seconds.count() << " sec\n";
- return 0; +}
newline
In zeromq/examples/example1/example1.cpp https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917 :
- ///=========================================================================
- void *cont_rep = zmq_ctx_new ();
- din = rcv_double (context, ZMQ_REP, "tcp://*:5580");
- std::cout <<" Message rcv: " << din << std::endl;
- std::cout << "=======================" << std::endl;
- ind = zmq_ctx_destroy (context);
- assert (ind == 0);
- end = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
- std::chrono::duration
elapsed_seconds = end-start; - std::time_t end_time = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(end);
- std::cout << "Elapsed time = " << elapsed_seconds.count() << " sec\n";
- return 0; +}
newline
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/pull/129#pullrequestreview-15719917, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFyMi8x7C99NdvPSAnejcljsskSh-_Swks5rQlCcgaJpZM4LdAZV .
huikang
anttikantee
Done, many thanks!
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 11:35 PM, huikang notifications@github.com wrote: