Closed leehuwuj closed 4 days ago
Latest commit: 745ef774525e503fc47d97aca04cae12ca66435e
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
The pull request introduces modifications across several files, primarily focusing on the handling of API keys in a Continuous Integration (CI) environment. In e2e/utils.ts
, the runCreateLlama
function was updated to exclude sensitive API keys from command arguments. Changes in helpers/providers/openai.ts
and questions/questions.ts
involve the introduction of a new isCI
constant that alters the logic for prompting users for API keys based on the execution environment. These adjustments streamline the user experience during automated processes while maintaining existing functionality and error handling.
File | Change Summary |
---|---|
e2e/utils.ts | Modified runCreateLlama to remove OPENAI_API_KEY and LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY from command args. Adjusted dataSourceArgs handling for flags. Retained error handling and application start logic. |
helpers/providers/openai.ts | Updated askOpenAIQuestions to include isCI check for API key prompt, allowing CI environments to bypass the prompt. |
questions/index.ts | Introduced isCI constant to determine CI environment, streamlining condition checks in askQuestions . |
questions/questions.ts | Modified askProQuestions to use isCI for LlamaCloud API key prompt logic, preventing prompts in CI environments. |
templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/services/file.py | Updated FileService methods to improve indexing logic and simplify access to project and pipeline IDs. |
runCreateLlama
function.runCreateLlama
function that interacts with LlamaCloud.π° In the land of code where bunnies play,
Weβve tidied up keys in a clever way.
In CI they hop, no prompts in sight,
With streamlined logic, everything feels right.
So letβs celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For cleaner code brings us all good cheer! π
[!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@leehuwuj has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review.
β How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.π¦ How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.π₯ Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27f183463e1c87973d9e9195de4c0778cdc011c3 and 745ef774525e503fc47d97aca04cae12ca66435e.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements