Thank you for this wonderful project. I have been using this package in my last class and it was really a time saver and productivity boost!
Regarding the peer review process i have to questions:
You have some team assignments in your vignette described, but there is no review process for such assignments! One suggestion could be to set up a peer_roster_create_group() and peer_assign_group() where group work, e.g. from group A, is distributed randomly to other students in this course, which are not in group A. If i have ten groups with 4 members each and all groups doing the same task this could produce 4 different reviews for each group. Most importantly they get a different view on the project and do not review their own work!
Same for peer_return: There could be a function peer_return_group() where the individual reviews are returned to the group again.
Is there any plan to include such functions or would you like me to make some suggestions?
Thank you for this wonderful project. I have been using this package in my last class and it was really a time saver and productivity boost!
Regarding the peer review process i have to questions:
peer_roster_create_group()andpeer_assign_group()where group work, e.g. from group A, is distributed randomly to other students in this course, which are not in group A. If i have ten groups with 4 members each and all groups doing the same task this could produce 4 different reviews for each group. Most importantly they get a different view on the project and do not review their own work!peer_return_group()where the individual reviews are returned to the group again.Is there any plan to include such functions or would you like me to make some suggestions?