Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Thanks for the suggestion.
You can already get some of this functionality via the existing query cache.
See the "Ensuring cached query results" section here:
https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/querying-data#querycaching
Basically, you can run a query that will only succeed if it hits in the cache.
You will never be charged for running this query, and if it fails, you can
choose whether to pay to re-run.
And of course, you can also run using the normal caching mechanism to get
standard best-effort caching.
The downside compared to the feature you requested is that the caching window
is only 24 hours, so you will always get a cache miss after that time, even if
the query results haven't changed.
Original comment by jcon...@google.com
on 13 Aug 2015 at 5:35
Hi,
unfortunately the existing query cache will not help in this case.
The cache is shared across all the users.
So if anybody will request the query results and my application will request
the same query — it will hit the cache anyway.
So it can't provide consistent behaviour for an automated dataflow.
Please, consider my FR or suggest a solution.
Original comment by bvz2001
on 14 Aug 2015 at 4:05
Actually, the query cache is per user. But we will consider your feature
request, since there are cases it covers that are not covered by the existing
cache.
Original comment by jcon...@google.com
on 14 Aug 2015 at 4:44
Original comment by thomasp...@google.com
on 24 Nov 2015 at 9:14
I would also like to see this feature. According to the API JavaDoc, query
caching is not available when destinationTable is set but we do that in ETL
style pipelines and it'd be great to be able to skip certain steps.
Original comment by nevi...@spotify.com
on 10 Dec 2015 at 7:24
Hi Jeremy and Thomas,
Is there any hope that this FR will be realeased in 2016?
The complexity of our BQ pipelines grows and it requires smarter query
scheduling than "daily/weekly".
Original comment by m.ostape...@owox.com
on 12 Apr 2016 at 10:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bvz2001
on 13 Aug 2015 at 4:56