Closed bbyalcinkaya closed 1 month ago
I'm working on a change to the frontend that will desugar #Or
patterns on the LHS of rules, so perhaps let's see if that works before reverting to this PR.
@bbyalcinkaya we should also test this with mx-backend to see if it works there before merging. No point merging something that won't work there. @Baltoli same goes for whatever frontend fix we get.
I tested this with mx-backend and it passes all the existing tests. I think we can merge this to avoid blocking mx-backend from receiving further updates. Also, there is a possibility that the desugaring may not work well with cut point rules in mx-backend. (runtimeverification/k#4363)
cc: @Baltoli
Yep, seems sensible to me!
Booster backend does not support or patterns. This PR aims to remove the occurrences of or patterns introduced in PR #265 while keeping the decision tree reasonably small.
In general, the semantics were refactored by:
*-instrs-empty / *-instrs-wait
)