Open eelco2k opened 5 months ago
i don't think it is really needed, cause it will issued the security of the API.
@rupadana i do not understand what you mean with issues the security of the API.
This PR will add functionality to use / select a different transformer via an HTTP header. so the response can be different json layout
@rupadana i think another, but better approach to selecting a different response from an api request would be the:
Accept Header / Media Type modification to something like this:
application/vnd.<api name>.<service name>.v<version>+json
in stead of the default:
application/json
so if a resource (BlogResource for example.) has 2 transformers (LargeTransformer::class, MinimumTransformer::class) you could request one or another transformer with the HTTP Accept header like so
application/vnd.blog.minimum-transformer+json
or
application/vnd.blog.large-transformer+json
what do you think?
@rupadana i do not understand what you mean with issues the security of the API.
This PR will add functionality to use / select a different transformer via an HTTP header. so the response can be different json layout
yeah we need validation into it, to prevert internal server error if the user parsing a wrong transformer
Aah okay I understand but for now it will fallback to DefaultTransformer if specified transformer cannot be found. But will see if I can add validation and validation error responses
@rupadana i think another, but better approach to selecting a different response from an api request would be the: Accept Header / Media Type modification to something like this:
application/vnd.<api name>.<service name>.v<version>+json
in stead of the default:
application/json
so if a resource (BlogResource for example.) has 2 transformers (LargeTransformer::class, MinimumTransformer::class) you could request one or another transformer with the HTTP Accept header like so
application/vnd.blog.minimum-transformer+json
orapplication/vnd.blog.large-transformer+json
what do you think?
That goods, i think we need a method that stores the transformer, the api can have more than one transformer.
Maybe like this
public function transformers(): array {
return [
"md5hash" => Md5HashTransformer::class,
"base64hash" => Base64HashTransormer::class,
"other-things" => OtherThingsTransformer::class
];
}
and maybe we can bring it to v4 for it
If you check my changes in PR you will see that method (not transformers() but getApiTransformers() , I believe it is. ) already is there.
If you check my changes in PR you will see that method (not transformers() but getApiTransformers() , I believe it is. ) already is there.
okay, let me review it
What happened?
possibility to define multiple Transformers (in Resource) as array. And use a specific transformer via HTTP headers defined in the config:
small example code:
use $transformer as key of the resource apiTransformer Array defined list and return the corresponding transformer class,
How to reproduce the bug
new addition
Package Version
latest
PHP Version
8.3
Laravel Version
11
Which operating systems does with happen with?
No response
Notes
No response