Open jgarte opened 1 month ago
I like it aesthetically, but I don't think it's workable in CL. It would have to be written :||
; not all Lisps allow binding macros to keywords; and generally it would be considered bad style in CL for a library to change a global binding outside its package.
Thanks for the reply. Your points make sense. Not sure what else to add but thanks for the information. I'll ponder it further. I might just write vanilla type specifiers instead when needed since the arrow conflicts with my threading arrow usually.
Hi,
What do you think if instead of
->
for annotating types that we use:
?So for example,
Instead of
This will avoid conflicts with lispers that like to commonly use function threading arrow macros such as
->
.What do you think?