Closed ElDominio closed 2 years ago
@ElDominio what revisions?
We had a change between B and C open question if that was improvement or degradation. @mck1117 @Qwerty-OFF do we have potential for improvement?
https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/AlphaX-4chan#changelog
rev A
rev B
rev C
I think when JLC assembly started, they only solder pads, not chip to board
they've always soldered the thermal pad underneath, and we've never had a problem with the 9201 on proteus or MRE
maybe the holes on rev E made them not solder the underneath pads? holes look empty as if the chip was floating
Tested between revB and revC, about 25F difference in temperatures (revB is cooler)
revB has no holes, revC does
ordered some of these to see if it helps with heat https://www.ebay.com/itm/125593267367?hash=item1d3df12ca7:g:VtUAAOSwhrpjYjbK&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAAoEdmZVHed9JVKE0A6GRZlCPYonMDn%2BO4c2a2NvOmNDOWGXHiuUTgjYkEmFq%2FXnuTIC8g7G4HJpxUzxxDhCSzZMErj8GeLb20OL5i%2F6w0OTEnM3W5V6PTIhvbYKAFRcffV9qO5yIvSEUeBTfHjn3Oq7aVxTf8RkifQWjDPK8aeidFh3FvZNeUpnu9twgl9r%2BPhCrqFcdLN4OigKJJCXB9%2FC8%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR5CmmoWRYQ
Tested between revB and revC, about 25F difference in temperatures (revB is cooler)
which is worse? B = C + 25 or C = B + 25?
Tested between revB and revC, about 25F difference in temperatures (revB is cooler)
which is worse? B = C + 25 or C = B + 25?
I said revB is colder lol, meaning C = B + 25
head empty no thoughts
Those won't do very much. The die is glued or soldered to the copper slug on the bottom, so you're going through a few mm of relatively thermally unconductive epoxy on the top. Can you try reflowing that chip with some more solder?
I had the guy that does pro reflowing do them today and there was basically no change. Wouldn't the holes make it have less surface area for conducting heat so make it heat up quicker?
@ElDominio i have an IR camera do you have an IR camera?
@ElDominio does it look like it's specific kind/model/vehicle ETB giving us problems or any ETB in general? I wonder what and how can I reproduce in NJ
That's what I measured with.
Right now I have it on 4 different setups and they all overheat. Where should we be grounding the ECU? I always tell my kids to ground directly to battery but might that be causing issues?
@ElDominio says this happens while engine is not running just ignition is ON
I am starting to wonder if that's tune / control strategy issue? Do we push these shut with 100% duty cycle or something? Need logs and tune.
Linking just in case https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/issues/4816
This is a log of an ETB converted car we have at the shop, looks for resting position and fails a bit into the log: -> https://rusefi.com/online/view.php?log=1103
Same car trying to autocalibrate, I have tried a myriad of values on feed forward and they don't make a difference -> https://rusefi.com/online/view.php?log=1104
If any videos are needed let me know; tune is tied to logs
This is another ETB conversion with a fifth gen Camaro throttle, 2012 throttle. Catching this car failing is difficult since it works most of the time, but it can someotimes give up randomly since it runs extremely hot.
Engine off key on -> https://rusefi.com/online/view.php?log=1105
running PID autocalibrate -> https://rusefi.com/online/view.php?log=1106 changed feed forward to be less positive in second run, you can still see it not getting exactly to 50
@ElDominio can you please post tune + log of Ray's blue car, ignition on engine off?
My point is - car at the shop I see crazy oscillation of duty cycle, I am comparing with nissan duty cycle chart and things are MUCH much smoother. Maybe energy magic happens when you change duty cycle that often that much?
shop car note crazy red line on top. Within two seconds it's constantly going -40% to +60%
now a log of my nissan sitting with engine off. Note how small is ETB Duty change when I am not touching pedal
@mck1117 how reasonable is my "energy"/total amount of change concern? Do we need some sort of volatility metric?
This is a log of an ETB converted car we have at the shop, looks for resting position and fails a bit into the log:
Please clarify if you are talking about 28 seconds timestamp or else
I see something happens and TPS stops moving. iTermMax is reached, VBATT goes up by 0.6
Any signal in VBAT going up so much when ETB shuts down?
This is a log of an ETB converted car we have at the shop, looks for resting position and fails a bit into the log:
Please clarify if you are talking about 28 seconds timestamp or else
I see something happens and TPS stops moving. iTermMax is reached, VBATT goes up by 0.6
Any signal in VBAT going up so much when ETB shuts down?
Confirm I am talking about 28 seconds into log
What signal about VBAT? Maybe not properly powered? All three grounds are directly to battery, and power is being supplied by a 12V relay directly to battery
Between VBat drop and ETB Duty volatility I am guessing that ETB volatility is a much bigger concern.
Step one: need someone smart to voice their opinion on ETB Duty volatility and that's pretty much @mck1117 maybe @Qwerty-OFF @dron0gus @andreika-git
if/when we agree to blame PID settings next question would be why has auto calibrate failed. Is that a defect in code or could any power concerns be causing it.
Cherry on the case https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/issues/4816 would that make a pattern of auto-calibrate being poor specifically on 4chan?! looks like next step would be to auto-calibrate same exact ETB on two different boards of different design. Let's see if @mck1117 would ask me to ship my test rig to him?
Question: couldn't different operating states be defined for the throttle control system?
I've seen some ECUs that jitter for a bit when changing position, then basically "lock in" and stop jittering (LinkECU principally). I'd assume that have different duty limits for different states.
That's also how an ancient throttle controller I had made worked and I would say it worked pretty well, but that's anecdotal evidence. https://github.com/ElDominio/ETC_Control
Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing tells us that a lot of things are possible with proper resources.
Yes some (many? all?) h-bridges have "hold" state and it could be relatively easy to implement. But proper approach is first to identify the problem and then start addressing it.
I see very different behavior between your tune and my tune. I believe that first step is to explain it. If the problem is only with calibration we shall focus on calibration
Realistically next step is for me to reproduce the issue in NJ. What exact part number ETB do we have problems with?
Another opinion: first we have to explain https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/issues/4816
Realistically next step is for me to reproduce the issue in NJ. What exact part number ETB do we have problems with?
Do we want to reproduce this instead in WA where I have the better test equipment to actually measure what’s going on?
Also, I don’t know what “hold state” means on an h bridge, but whatever it is, the tle9201 doesn’t have it.
Best option is both WA and NJ :) @ElDominio we need exact part number to start acquiring matching stuff
Bosch 99760511501
And
12629992 (GM LS?)
And
22030-21030 (Yaris)
And
22030-31030
If i have addresses i can buy them on ebay and ship them
That's porsche fancy?! How come?
and LS less fancy :)
Let me cross-test same ETBs between 4chan and Proteus
@ElDominio my bigger concern is not ETBs but connectors.
GM seems easiest and I have some VAG and Nissan pigtails for sure.
@mck1117 do you have a 4chan in WA or is it a 2chan you have?
@ElDominio I have one or two logs and four part numbers for different ETBs. Do you see my problem?
I offered to buy them so you can do it on your end, I was asked for logs and part numbers and I provided them lol
@ElDominio please clarify which log is which ETB, which ETB is most problematic? Looks like GM is not horrible and we better start with a horrible one.
@ElDominio please confirm that you can source pigtails not just ETBs.
I have the same pigtail problem but if i can source a pigtail + etb i will ship
@ElDominio please clarify which log is which ETB, which ETB is most problematic? Looks like GM is not horrible and we better start with a horrible one.
@ElDominio please clarify which log is which ETB, which ETB is most problematic? Looks like GM is not horrible and we better start with a horrible one.
1103 and 1104 are the most problematic, Bosch throttle body log.
Correct, GM is not horrible. Takes sometimes about a half hour to fail. Bosch fails almost instantly
@ElDominio my Nissan logs are at https://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=46623#p46623 and https://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=46624#p46624
over the phone discussion #79
user error/software error https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/issues/4832#issuecomment-1331639530
In two cars already, when the car is keyed on ETB driver keeps having a very hard time to control ETB position (it even makes audible noises? wtf?) until it overheats and shutdown. Any way to improve cooling?
Temperature tested by touching the driver on key on