search

rusefi / rusefi_documentation

User documentation for rusEFI engine control unit
GNU General Public License v3.0
23 stars 30 forks source link

should "rusefi/firmware/tunerstudio/docs/readme.MD" be moved to doc repo? #421

Closed mi-hol closed 1 year ago

mi-hol commented 1 year ago

Several questions related to TunerStudio docs

  1. should "rusefi/firmware/tunerstudio/docs/readme.MD" be moved to doc repo?
  2. current reference "![TS](0 - 2 Tuning menu (2-47).png)" does not draw correctly. Reason unclear, but maybe file name containing blanks & special chars
  3. "Tuner Studio dialogs as of May 2017" could the pictures be refreshed and file names without blanks & special chars be used?
rusefillc commented 1 year ago

so much stuff piles together :(

please create individual tickets with https://xyproblem.info/ I have no motivation to move files since I see no explanation of why such actions would benefit who

mi-hol commented 1 year ago

Fact: there is a pile of obsolete and unmaintained docs scattered over many places

Problem: Users are confused on state of rusEFI and its capabilities. Leading to potential new user to choose instead another EFI/ECU solution. Cleanup activities are blocked instead of getting supported (see https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi_documentation/pull/404)

rusefillc commented 1 year ago

Fact: i ask you be to less vague and you go more vague :)

rusefillc commented 1 year ago

See https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/commit/946b31296a6abb899ddaa9fee21951f5af015400 for my thoughts on this

PS: @mi-hol in my opinion we are facing negative consequence of your choice to make a shortcut and put more stress on me.

In my opinion higher quality ticket would have explicit https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/tree/master/firmware/tunerstudio/docs URL

mi-hol commented 1 year ago

blocked until https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi_documentation/issues/423 is closed

mi-hol commented 1 year ago

not feasible