Closed WhyNotHugo closed 1 year ago
The previous description assumed that the reader is writing the code that returns nom::Err. It was very confusing when reading it as a someone handling this return type.
nom::Err
Hopefully this wording is more neutral and clearer is both contexts.
thanks!
The previous description assumed that the reader is writing the code that returns
nom::Err
. It was very confusing when reading it as a someone handling this return type.Hopefully this wording is more neutral and clearer is both contexts.