Closed tcharding closed 10 months ago
This looks good and I think we could merge it as-is. But I think the ffi
module should only contain C bindings, because that's idiomatically what users expect to find in a module called ffi
. And these bindings should be exposed to the public.
No worries.
EDIT: Deleted all the stuff I wrote as unnecessary for you to read after spending some more time playing with the PR.
Force pushed the following:
ffi
moduleCould you move the version-bump commit to its own PR? It's easier for me to run my testing script.
but utACK 59459734bc968aa68a29cedc7174b68c43aba428
Can do, no sweat!
Can you merge and release please @apoelstra? Then I'll rebase #70, but that one will need a bit of thought to review because it involves changes to how we vendor the Core code.
Tagged and published.
Legend!
In preparation for release bump the version and add a changelog entry.