Closed japaric closed 5 years ago
upside: clarity FourByteAligned<_> (or Aligned4<_>) is clearer than Aligned<u32, _>
FourByteAligned<_>
Aligned4<_>
Aligned<u32, _>
downside: lost of generics. I would have to create one different type per alignment, whereas today the alignment is specified via a type paramater.
upside: clarity
FourByteAligned<_>(orAligned4<_>) is clearer thanAligned<u32, _>downside: lost of generics. I would have to create one different type per alignment, whereas today the alignment is specified via a type paramater.