Closed alberdingk-thijm closed 3 years ago
I agree. Please do send a PR.
Sorry for the radio silence. I had noticed some values still printed strangely, but was distracted by other work. I'll take some time to look into it later this week and make a PR.
Was this ever fixed?
I never followed up on my "threat", unfortunately! Anyone else is welcome to beat me to making the PR; I think my branch has a working solution, so I can submit a PR later today too.
PR has been submitted!
I noticed recently that, due to the strict bounds checking in
pick_appropriate_units()
insrc/measurement.rs
, that the following code was not producing the output I was expecting:prints the following:
whereas I had expected it to print:
I figure the former is perhaps more precise, but seemed a bit ugly for display when dealing with units which didn't need that precision, particularly given that if I change
val
to be1.00000000001
, I get the output I was expecting (due to precision formatting).I've gone and updated my branch to use the latter by changing
value > 1.0 || value < -1.0
tovalue >= 1.0 || value <= -1.0
inpick_appropriate_units()
. If this is something that is generally more useful, or something to offer as an opt-in, I'd be happy to submit a PR.