Open jacobrosenthal opened 2 years ago
this could be the 'embassy' feature instead of async
I think this is a good idea - Embassy might go away one day. Maybe call it async-embassy
? That way we can have async-whatever
for other executors if we need it.
Fixed the trait, but pr is still a bit of a mess
send
fn to make a send_async
fn. I cant think of a good way to have the enum discriminants pulled into a From impl or somethingBut check it out does seem to work
It would be awesome if eventually there were a rutime-agnostic set of async traits. We're not ready yet (need more experimentation) but it would be cool if just the traits from embassy became managed by embedded-wg or similar so that if someone wants to use a different runtime they can.
Id track here https://github.com/rust-embedded/embedded-hal/pull/285
and after that we need Prs to help the hals asyncify
Well this is one way to do multiple target examples
I just looked into trying to use this, but it seems like sync operations are still used for non-flush
operations?
Unfortunately I think that means that it can't be used with a proxy object from shared-bus
, since it only provides async OR sync traits, but not both at the same time.
On the bright side, the async traits are now closer to standardized with the embedded-hal-async
crate.
Draft for discussion. Could support multiple traits, this could be the 'embassy' feature instead of async...