Closed ianrrees closed 1 year ago
I've force-pushed changes to bump the patch version.
Also can report that the tests pass on ATSAMD21 and ATSAMD51 boards when using a branch of the HAL that has a couple minor updates to work with the newer usb-device. Once the HAL changes are merged, I'll aim to get back to https://github.com/rust-embedded-community/usb-device/issues/100
Hello, can we use this opportunity to make BuilderError public or does it need it's own PR?
Sounds good to me! @ithinuel does the new commit work for your purpose?
It does, thank you 👍
Sorry to throw this in at the last minute (and end of a long day for me - apologies if this doesn't make sense!) but I'm wondering if BuilderError
is maybe too generic of a name, for something that is put in the prelude - lots of things use Builder... Maybe UsbBuilderError
, or a super-verbose UsbDeviceBuilderError
?
If people don't like the name, they can rename it during import. The same argument can be made for Error
If https://github.com/rust-embedded-community/usb-device/pull/133 is accepted, this should have the explicit
use
forLangID
removed from the example code.