It would be good if you could provide cargo-fuzz with the location of an already installed instance of llvm-profdata to run on cargo fuzz coverage. In the case the user does not provide an installation the current logic of falling back to rustc llvm-tools-preview can be used by default.
It would be good if you could provide cargo-fuzz with the location of an already installed instance of
llvm-profdatato run oncargo fuzz coverage. In the case the user does not provide an installation the current logic of falling back to rustc llvm-tools-preview can be used by default.grcovalready provides this option asllvm-path