Closed Philippe-Cholet closed 1 year ago
@phimuemue What do you think of this new version?
MergeJoinBy
do not have a fourth type here, as you thought possible (the small FuncLR
trait that make it work seems reasonable to me).
Rebased after recent #751.
That feature was quite a ride for me. 🎉
@jswrenn Note that you are mixing different PRs with the "next" milestone.
What do you mean by "mixing"?
We use the next
milestone to keep track of highlights that should be noted in the changelog. (Caveat: We haven't been very consistent about doing so, lately.)
Just that old PRs of 0.11 are with the new ones, which I noticed and found weird but if it's not an issue then case closed.
Cleaner alternative to the experimental/messy #711. Closes #701. @phimuemue I would additionally rename
InternalMergeJoinBy
toMergeBy
, makingMergeJoinBy
an alias ofMergeBy
instead. But I would like your opinion on this first. I recently found a way to not add a fourth type toMergeJoinBy
(added to the old PR) but another difference is that I do not wrap withMergeFuncT
anymore.