Open workingjubilee opened 3 months ago
Obviously this change is somewhat gratuitous, so if anyone has some strong opinions otherwise, I'm listening. However, it's really important for an unsafe
interface to be very clear, so...
I do think this make sense to me. trace
is indeed just a loop in fancy clothing so ControlFlow
is the most correct type, Correctness is important and, as you say, that's especially true in unsafe code.
This may not be the most crucial change in the world but if we're looking at ways to improve the API then this should be one of them.
The war on
bool
willcontinue
.And thus we should use
ControlFlow::Break
to indicate forward progress should be stopped in backtrace's$(($MAJOR+1))
version.