Closed Eh2406 closed 11 months ago
Hello, what is the status of this issue? I am looking for a good-first-issue, can i make a try ...
IIRC, it has just been integrated into the recently stabilized credential provider, under the credential provider alias cargo:paseto
. See doc for more.
If you are willing to help stabilize asymmetric token feature, there are some unresolved issue listed in #10519 looking for helps. Yet there is no clear mentorship of them at this moment, and it might require extra efforts to figure out the plan and design.
If you are looking for issues open for contribution in general, issues with https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/labels/S-accepted and https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/labels/E-easy are good starts. Please read the doc on issue label system for more.
Thank you.
@arlosi, I am going to close this as resolved since you've checked the box in #10519. Feel free to reopen if there are more needing to be addressed.
IIRC, it has just been integrated into the recently stabilized credential provider, under the credential provider alias
cargo:paseto
. See doc for more.If you are willing to help stabilize asymmetric token feature, there are some unresolved issue listed in #10519 looking for helps. Yet there is no clear mentorship of them at this moment, and it might require extra efforts to figure out the plan and design.
If you are looking for issues open for contribution in general, issues with S-accepted Status: Issue or feature is accepted, and has a team member available to help mentor or review and E-easy Experience: Easy are good starts. Please read the doc on issue label system for more.
Thank you.
OK, thank you for you suggestions.
The RFC describes how credential processes can generate Asymmetric Tokens, however that was not implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/10771 . We should implement this before stabilization.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10519