Open hi-rustin opened 2 weeks ago
Curious, what is the role of this tracking issue. I'm assuming we can't have this feature be unstable and instead must insta-stable it like cargo add
and cargo remove
. At which point, we are just tracking the command being merged which the original issue can handle. Likely, the tasks listed are not blockers. This is a UX heavy command and we have a lot of flexibility of adding / removing functionality.
As a hub connecting to other issues? That said, we can create a label Command-info
for this purpose.
Summary
Rust Internals: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/feedback-on-cargo-info-to-prepare-it-for-merging/20369 Original issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/948 Implementation: TBD Documentation: TBD
We developed 'cargo-information' as a solution for #948
Features:
And in the last six months, we have released 8 versions and had 3,428 downloads. At the same time, we have covered almost all the features it needs. So I think it is a good time to merge it back into Cargo and prove it to all Cargo users.
Unresolved Issues
Future Extensions
No response
About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation. They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions. A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature. Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.