Closed KodrAus closed 2 months ago
Would it be a good idea to mention tracing_log
in the list, for it enables forwarding tracing
to log
or visa versa?
@NobodyXu Definitely :+1: It's a bit surprising we don't mention tracing
at all in there.
Maybe we should just change the wording? For example from:
There are many available implementations to choose from, here are some of the most popular ones:
To:
There are many available implementations to choose from, here are some options:
@Thomasdezeeuw that sounds good to me.
@KodrAus any further changes we want to make?
@Thomasdezeeuw I think it's all ok now. Are you happy for this issue to be closed?
In https://github.com/rust-lang/log/pull/548#issuecomment-1486869928 @JohnTitor brought up the broader question of what to do with the list of integrations listed in the README. They're currently presented as "the most popular" implementations out there. Right now the list isn't really curated that way; if there's a new crate that integrates with
log
then we add it to the list.The function the list serves is giving users a kick-start to get actual data out of
log
, which on its own simply pipes your events into oblivion.Alternative strategies to achieving that function are:
log
orlogger
as mentioned in the linked comment.log
. It's up to end-users to evaluate the suitability of these libraries for their own needs.