Closed BatmanAoD closed 4 years ago
I suggest CC0 because (1) I don't expect this repo to have code, and (2) I don't expect sharing without attribution to be a problem
I would suggest we use the same license as the rust-rfcs repository -- we tend to just use the same dual-licensing scheme there for overall simplicity.
Will submit separate PRs for Apache & MIT licenses
I suggest CC0 because (1) I don't expect this repo to have code, and (2) I don't expect sharing without attribution to be a problem