As long as <typeof(value) as Clone>::clone is known not to panic, this:
unsafe {
let mut ptr = self.buf.ptr();
for i in 0..(self.len) {
ptr::write(ptr, value.clone());
ptr = ptr.offset(1);
self.len += 1;
}
}
Must be optimizable to this:
unsafe {
let mut ptr = self.buf.ptr();
for i in 0..(self.len) {
ptr::write(ptr, value.clone());
ptr = ptr.offset(1);
}
self.len += n;
}
This optimization is important because the latter loop can be further optimized to a memcpy when value is Copy. However, this optimization requires that the memory referenced to by ptr not alias with self.len.
We used to do that optimization in older versions of rustc (using an LLVM noalias attribute, not in trans), but stopped emitting that attribute because LLVM's semantics miss the "is known not to panic" requirement. If we deal with that issue, we would like to apply noalias again.
One optimization we want for sure:
As long as
<typeof(value) as Clone>::clone
is known not to panic, this:Must be optimizable to this:
This optimization is important because the latter loop can be further optimized to a
memcpy
whenvalue
isCopy
. However, this optimization requires that the memory referenced to byptr
not alias withself.len
.We used to do that optimization in older versions of rustc (using an LLVM
noalias
attribute, not in trans), but stopped emitting that attribute because LLVM's semantics miss the "is known not to panic" requirement. If we deal with that issue, we would like to applynoalias
again.