Closed GuillaumeGomez closed 1 week ago
The run-make-support library was changed
cc @jieyouxu
Some changes occurred in run-make tests.
cc @jieyouxu
The job mingw-check-tidy
failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)
The job mingw-check-tidy
failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)
CI passed this time. :)
Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup
:pushpin: Commit bb474aa622098ca10792d0a8717d95dc0f3420fd has been approved by jieyouxu
It is now in the queue for this repository.
Thanks for the notification, fixed it.
@bors r=jieyouxu rollup
:pushpin: Commit 34fe2172b16fb9d80c76e51ab4703bd297d630fe has been approved by jieyouxu
It is now in the queue for this repository.
:hourglass: Testing commit 34fe2172b16fb9d80c76e51ab4703bd297d630fe with merge 25e3949aa1b24b3f62a72c1f713830aa1d1efcd4...
:sunny: Test successful - checks-actions Approved by: jieyouxu Pushing 25e3949aa1b24b3f62a72c1f713830aa1d1efcd4 to master...
Finished benchmarking commit (25e3949aa1b24b3f62a72c1f713830aa1d1efcd4): comparison URL.
@rustbot label: -perf-regression
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
Bootstrap: 676.654s -> 676.836s (0.03%) Artifact size: 315.91 MiB -> 315.81 MiB (-0.03%)
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121876.
There was a weird naming inconsistency with
input
/output
. A few tests write.arg("-o").arg(path)
and theoutput
method was actually the command output. So instead, I renamed the originaloutput
intocommand_output
so that I could create theoutput
method with the expected effect (and updated the tests to use it too).EDIT: The first two commits come from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124711. Some weird things happened recently pparently. ^^'
r? @jieyouxu