Closed Marcondiro closed 1 week ago
r? @joboet
rustbot has assigned @joboet. They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.
Use r?
to explicitly pick a reviewer
There are merge commits (commits with multiple parents) in your changes. We have a no merge policy so these commits will need to be removed for this pull request to be merged.
You can start a rebase with the following commands:
$ # rebase
$ git rebase -i master
$ # delete any merge commits in the editor that appears
$ git push --force-with-lease
The following commits are merge commits:
@rustbot author
@rustbot review
Maybe bors missed the command @joboet I think it wants an empty line before the command :)
@Marcondiro: :key: Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers
Let's try again then! @bors r+
:pushpin: Commit bbdf97254a2ed63d764a39e92a3adcecc49b962b has been approved by joboet
It is now in the queue for this repository.
:hourglass: Testing commit bbdf97254a2ed63d764a39e92a3adcecc49b962b with merge 238c1e798d371440847e53b5f00db86610d0e263...
:sunny: Test successful - checks-actions Approved by: joboet Pushing 238c1e798d371440847e53b5f00db86610d0e263 to master...
Finished benchmarking commit (238c1e798d371440847e53b5f00db86610d0e263): comparison URL.
@rustbot label: -perf-regression
This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
mean | range | count | |
---|---|---|---|
Regressions ❌ (primary) |
- | - | 0 |
Regressions ❌ (secondary) |
- | - | 0 |
Improvements ✅ (primary) |
- | - | 0 |
Improvements ✅ (secondary) |
-0.4% | [-0.5%, -0.4%] | 5 |
All ❌✅ (primary) | - | - | 0 |
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.
Bootstrap: 674.785s -> 675.773s (0.15%) Artifact size: 315.96 MiB -> 315.82 MiB (-0.04%)
Hello, This PR fixes issue #124714 about 'Σ' handling in
str.to_lowercase()
. The fix consists in considering the full original string during 'Σ' handling instead of considering just the substring left after the optimized ascii handling. A new test is added to avoid regression. Thanks!