search

rust-lang / rust

Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
https://www.rust-lang.org
Other
93.93k stars 12.09k forks source link

Rollup of 3 pull requests #125233

Closed jieyouxu closed 2 weeks ago

jieyouxu commented 2 weeks ago

Successful merges:

r? @ghost @rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jieyouxu commented 2 weeks ago

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

bors commented 2 weeks ago

:pushpin: Commit 650bbb5a776a48344c1fb894420dc5494ea603c6 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors commented 2 weeks ago

:hourglass: Testing commit 650bbb5a776a48344c1fb894420dc5494ea603c6 with merge 8e78d168040b2d7106a28712c39106602c7a1d61...

bors commented 2 weeks ago

:sunny: Test successful - checks-actions Approved by: jieyouxu Pushing 8e78d168040b2d7106a28712c39106602c7a1d61 to master...

rust-timer commented 2 weeks ago

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#125213 Migrate run-make/static-unwinding to rmake 86ad4386f54f163630a8bda14e736034f44a8c84 (link)
#125215 Migrate run-make/issue64319 to rmake and rename 6ae3612259aeb5c1b292f8f43ee7a02ff264c838 (link)
#125221 Migrate run-make/issue-28766 to rmake f78391db872205d24cef40c8aa0585f083ae9358 (link)

previous master: 9b75a43881

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

rust-timer commented 2 weeks ago

Finished benchmarking commit (8e78d168040b2d7106a28712c39106602c7a1d61): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 4.6%) This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. | | mean | range | count | |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | Regressions ❌
(primary) | - | - | 0 | | Regressions ❌
(secondary) | 4.6% | [4.6%, 4.6%] | 1 | | Improvements ✅
(primary) | -2.5% | [-2.5%, -2.5%] | 1 | | Improvements ✅
(secondary) | - | - | 0 | | All ❌✅ (primary) | -2.5% | [-2.5%, -2.5%] | 1 |

Cycles

Results (primary -0.8%, secondary -2.9%) This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. | | mean | range | count | |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | Regressions ❌
(primary) | 6.6% | [6.6%, 6.6%] | 1 | | Regressions ❌
(secondary) | 4.5% | [4.5%, 4.5%] | 1 | | Improvements ✅
(primary) | -3.3% | [-4.3%, -2.5%] | 3 | | Improvements ✅
(secondary) | -3.7% | [-5.7%, -2.2%] | 9 | | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.8% | [-4.3%, 6.6%] | 4 |

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 668.325s -> 668.38s (0.01%) Artifact size: 316.15 MiB -> 316.17 MiB (0.01%)