Open rinon opened 6 years ago
This should be fixed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59173.
libLLVM.dylib
as mentioned above.This is not just a redistribution problem, but also leads to a general FTBFS while bootstrapping with clang compilers since rust 1.34.0.
1.34.0 now seems to put libLLVM.dylib
into the stage0-$arch/lib
artifacts dir and use that via DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
, so subsequent usages of clang
will fail to execute.
1.33.0 and prior didn't do this. They only created a librustc_codegen_llvm-llvm.dylib
file as a later stage artifact (1? 2?), which didn't clash with system libraries.
I'm stupid - rust isn't compiling its own version of llvm
- at least not when passing --llvm-root
.
The problem is that the precompiled 1.33 binaries that are used to bootstrap rust contain a libLLVM.dylib
file which makes compiling with clang impossible since the rust-root lib directory is added to the dynamic linker library path, overriding the correct LLVM library.
I'm stupid - rust isn't compiling its own version of
llvm
- at least not when passing--llvm-root
. ...
@Ionic The problem is most likely the same in as in cargo, people assume DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
is equivalent to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
and set it to whatever but it's actually not thes same. DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
is a hack and should not be used at all if possible because it overrides default system search paths. Instead, DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH
should be used; as those paths are only searched if a suitable library cannot be found in the default locations.
Sent with GitHawk
Now that
libLLVM.so
is distributed with rust, we are unable to dynamically link a rust binary against a differentlibLLVM.so
library. The rustlib directory containinglibLLVM
is prepended to the linker search path, and I don't see a good way to ask cargo to add a search path earlier than the rustlib is added. It looks to me like the rustlib directory is added here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/15d770400eed9018f18bddf83dd65cb7789280a5/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/back/link.rs#L1044I noticed that support for appending a suffix to the LLVM libs was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53987. Can we turn that on for CI so the prebuilt distributions have a suffix on the library?
Unfortunately, the suffix won't actually fix this issue on MacOS, since the LLVM build does not append the suffix (or any version info) to the name of the dynamic library when building on MacOS: (see https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/blob/7051ead40a5f825878b59bf08d4e768be9e99a4a/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake#L520)