Open jyn514 opened 3 years ago
@workingjubilee hmm, I'm not sure why you marked this as A-cli? The intention is to remove the flag completely when the blocking issues are fixed, and have this always on.
:shrug:
Apart from marking the impl as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/S-tracking-impl-incomplete / “incomplete” (buggy), I'm marking it as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/S-tracking-design-concerns because there have been lots of discussions around the question whether we want to normalize/evaluate constant expressions in rustdoc at all[^1] (“intent” vs. “representation”) and by extension the same concern applies to types. See #102456, #99630, Zulip discussion.
[^1]: Or rather only if the corresponding item was marked with a new attribute.
This is a tracking issue for the rustdoc feature
-Z normalize-docs
. This normalizes projections like<Vec<T> as IntoIterator>::IntoIter
tostd::vec::IntoIter<T>
in the generated documentation.About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation. They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions. A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature. Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Steps
Unresolved Questions
No unresolved questions known, this is "just hard".
Implementation history