Open jonas-schievink opened 3 years ago
Technically this already existed, but I'll close mine in favor of this one: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69431
Ah okay, normally we don't have tracking issues for things that aren't implemented
Hi! 👋🏻 I discovered while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104321 that async blocks can trivially be const as soon as the https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104826 workaround is fixed.
Depending on whats happening with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104826, what would be the next steps in moving forward with the feature flag/stabilization?
Is there anything preventing this from getting stabilized? I'd like to do the remaining work to push this to stabilization.
This is a tracking issue for use of
async {}
expressions in const contexts. The feature gate for the issue is#![feature(const_async_blocks)]
.About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation. They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions. A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature. Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Steps
Unresolved Questions
Implementation history