Open bjorn3 opened 11 months ago
The function to insert this section is called at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c0b4f67c9b4bf477df38c16669fd576d46a2b3d/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/base.rs#L464
I'm interested in working on this issue.
The code you've linked (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/ab0f3e680e4fd50218914b8afa6900a67377721c/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/gdb.rs) seems to already contain logic to add pretty-printers. What exactly is the issue here?
That is the implementation in the LLVM backend. We need a separate implementation in rustc_codegen_cranelift.
@bjorn3 is this issue still open .wanted to work on this .Looking forward to hear from you .
Yes, this change is still wanted. However someone else also asked if they could pick it up at https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/pull/1462#issuecomment-2191170590 a couple of days ago, so I would like to give them a chance first.
thanks for your response ,i also add the comment on #1462 if the person wanted to work ,i can help.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/attributes/debugger.html#using-debugger_visualizer-with-gdb https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/ab0f3e680e4fd50218914b8afa6900a67377721c/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/gdb.rs
The
.debug_gdb_scripts
section should contain\x01gdb_load_rust_pretty_printers.py
followed by for each#![debugger_visualizer(gdb_script_file = "...")]
the pretty printer inlined into the executable. Except if one of the conditions to omit.debug_gdb_scripts
is true.