Closed bjorn3 closed 1 month ago
r? @Amanieu
rustbot has assigned @Amanieu. They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.
Use r?
to explicitly pick a reviewer
CI failure is unrelated (the test thinks the int3 padding should be counted towards the instruction count and rejects it due to having too many instructions)
While rustc accepts it just fine due to what is arguably a bug, this duplication does become an issue when generating functions from the llvm intrinsic declarations while reusing the argument names.