rust-lang / team

Rust teams structure
Apache License 2.0
306 stars 281 forks source link

Add a batch of 3 repositories for archival #1387

Closed Kobzol closed 3 months ago

Kobzol commented 3 months ago

These repositories are not yet archived!

I added them for archivation based on https://hackmd.io/@rust-leadership-council/Bk6ge9Xu6 and/or what I thought was an obsolete repository.

org = "rust-lang"
name = "atom-ide-rust"
description = "Rust IDE support for Atom, powered by the Rust Analyzer or Rust Language Server"
bots = []

[access.teams]
security = "pull"

[access.individuals]
jdno = "admin"
rust-lang-owner = "admin"
Mark-Simulacrum = "admin"
aergonaut = "write"
mehcode = "write"
alexheretic = "write"
badboy = "admin"
pietroalbini = "admin"
rylev = "admin"
aminya = "maintain"

org = "rust-lang"
name = "foundation-faq-2020"
description = "Have questions on the Rust Foundation? Ask here!"
bots = []

[access.teams]
security = "pull"
core = "admin"
all = "pull"

[access.individuals]
rust-lang-owner = "admin"
badboy = "admin"
jdno = "admin"
rylev = "admin"
pietroalbini = "admin"
Mark-Simulacrum = "admin"

org = "rust-lang"
name = "ghost-code-initiative"
description = ""
bots = []

[access.teams]
security = "pull"
lang = "maintain"

[access.individuals]
scottmcm = "maintain"
badboy = "admin"
joshtriplett = "maintain"
jdno = "admin"
rylev = "admin"
pietroalbini = "admin"
Mark-Simulacrum = "admin"
rust-lang-owner = "admin"
nikomatsakis = "maintain"
pnkfelix = "maintain"
tmandry = "maintain"

ehuss commented 3 months ago

Is crates.io-infra a private repo? I can't see it.

I'm actually not certain of the datafrog repo. I would check with @nikomatsakis or @lqd to see what they want to do with it.

I also don't know what ghost-code-initiative is. It looks like something created by @Mark-Simulacrum.

Kobzol commented 3 months ago

Is crates.io-infra a private repo? I can't see it.

Ooh, good point, I haven't realized it, since I can actually access it as a member of t-infra. I will remove it from this PR, since we don't really support private repositories at the moment (or rather, we do, but we don't manage them, so I don't want to add this as a precedent).

lqd commented 3 months ago

If possible I’d prefer not to archive datafrog for now, as we work on alternatives. We may want to merge PRs and do releases until that happens.

Kobzol commented 3 months ago

Ok, removed the private repo and datafrog from this PR.

rylev commented 3 months ago

@Kobzol looks like we can either wait for @Mark-Simulacrum on what the ghost-code-initiative is or we remove it, and we can merge this. I'll leave that up to you.

Kobzol commented 3 months ago

Unless it's some top secret project, I assume it's headed for archival. But there's no rush, so let's wait for Mark's response.

Mark-Simulacrum commented 3 months ago

I think it's a lang team initiative that I've not heard anything about for a while. Archiving seems safe.