Open briansmith opened 4 weeks ago
@josephlr @newpavlov Could we review and merge this PR, which doesn't have the MSAN-specific changes to it? I have other testing enhancements that depend on this, that I don't want to block on the MSAN stuff.
@josephlr @newpavlov Could we review and merge this PR, which doesn't have the MSAN-specific changes to it? I have other testing enhancements that depend on this, that I don't want to block on the MSAN stuff.
Sorry for the delay. The testing code is currently a mess. #471 should fix things to stop relying on weird module renaming hacks. I also included the ideas form this CL into that one. If #471 looks good to you, feel free to close this.
None of the tests are testing
getrandom_uninit()
directly, but instead it is marked as covered becausegetrandom()
forwards to it. However, this means we're never testing an uninitialized input togetrandom_uninit()
. Fix that.