Closed SSheldon closed 4 years ago
When the next version of rss is published, I'd also love to see a new version of atom so that both crates are off of failure and have the builders feature. But I can file a separate issue on atom them :)
I'm not sure which version should be, 2.0.0
or 1.9.0
? @rust-syndication/publish
Here's my assessment if it's useful:
Error::Xml
was changed to no longer be a failure::Compat
, but it's still a type that implements Error
, so realistically I doubt this is likely to break real world code. This type has been changed in the past without requiring a major version bump.ITunesCategory::subcategory
no longer returns a reference to a Box
quick-xml
and url
were updated, but they aren't really public facing, except their error types?To me, the biggest thing to consider there seems to be ITunesCategory::subcategory
, but even that doesn't seem worth a new major release. So I think a 1.9.0 is justifiable.
1.9.0
sounds good to me, I will release a new version in two days, feel free to show your opinion.
published
The last version of
rss
was published 8 months ago! There have been some nice improvements since then that haven't been published, including:Could a maintainer tag and publish a new version?