consider how to name the priority levels assigned to different components (consts, re-export, etc.)
It seems to me like the goals ought to be:
collecting all the named priorities in a single place, so we can easily answer e.g. "is UART0 or UART1 going to take precedence?"
making it very easy to re-assign priorities, e.g. "let's raise UART0's priority above UART1's" without violating safety guarantees
[ ] what might go wrong here? do we have an example change in mind?
nice to have: the ability to reshape (ideally, transparently to the other modules) the priority system to introduce e.g. fn masking_threshold for a priority (i.e. the next enum element)
It seems to me like the goals ought to be:
fn masking_thresholdfor a priority (i.e. the next enum element)what do you think?
Originally posted by @sethp in https://github.com/rustbox/esp32c3-vgaterm/issues/15#issuecomment-1456356425