Closed jllysoft closed 1 year ago
I understand that there are no device groups, which means that more licenses must be purchased for the virtual users described in #129.
BUT the question is still why the web console does not manage the group authorization, which is managed by the client? In this case, it is important that only the user belonging to the group can see the devices belonging to this group.
BUT the question is still why the web console does not manage the group authorization, which is managed by the client? In this case, it is important that only the user belonging to the group can see the devices belonging to this group.
What does this mean?
Hello
We have a problem with the current group management.
The basic problem is that a device can only be assigned to a group via a user. We have a license for 20 users and 500 devices. The number of real users is 15, who belong to 6 groups. The devices should be classified into about 30 groups according to their place of use, but there are not enough users for this.
In both cases, however, it is necessary that only the devices to which the group can access based on assignment appear in the web console! This would be important for us because the address book function is provided by the web console. (as far as we know, there is currently no address book synchronization between the server and the client)
Hi. Laszlo Szabo