Closed honsunrise closed 1 year ago
If you look at the CI annotation (failure in doc tests at src/der/parser.rs#L335), you'll see the lifetime problem explained above in parse_der_implicit
, parse_ber_implicit
and others: the Header
would now be forced to have the lifetime of the input bytes.
Now, I do not think the solution is to tie the lifetimes together, there is no real reason to do so, and it add constraints to the input.
Hi,
Thank you for the PR. However, I'm not sure setting the
Header
lifetime to the input's is required: in those functions, the header is only used, not stored, so there are situations where the header could live less time than the input.I think that if you want to clarify the lifetime, then adding an explicit second lifetime (for ex
'hdr
), different from'a
, would be the correct way.